Google points to an alternative to augmented reality virtual worlds

Google points to an alternative to augmented reality virtual worlds

Google points to an alternative to augmented reality virtual worlds

Google CEO Sundar Pichai (backside left) reveals off a prototype of the brand new Glass at Google I/O 2022 on May 11

In the ultimate minutes of a two-hour speech that kicked off the Google I/O convention on May 11, the corporate’s CEO, Sundar Pichai, outlined a proposal for a brand new model of a product that went terribly mistaken a couple of years in the past: Google Glass. Although it takes up far much less house than the opposite merchandise proven there, the truth that it ends the demo is symbolic.

Google typically makes use of its annual developer occasion as an area to showcase ideas that can keep in individuals’s imaginations and ultimately turn out to be merchandise. This time round, the advert gives an alternative to the virtual world, and Mark Zuckerberg has nailed the thought, even altering his firm title from Facebook to Meta.

We are shifting in direction of a extra immersive digital life. The “new Google Glass” continues to be a prototype, nearer to aspiration than a industrial product. Still, it opens up unbelievable technological potentialities. It stays to be seen whether or not the corporate can circumvent the issues of the ill-fated authentic, particularly these associated to invasion of privateness.


See this video article:


Launched in 2013, Google Glass capitalized on a pattern within the tech trade on the time, enabling good merchandise with out buttons. It’s a private mission by the corporate’s co-founder Sergey Brin, and it proposes the power to make telephone calls with no smartphone, simply take images and movies, and browse the net, all projected on a small laptop in entrance of a pc. on the display screen. proper eye.

Technological improvements and expectations surrounding Google Glass counsel this might be one other massive success for the corporate. But a collection of issues made it a whole failure, and manufacturing was discontinued in 2015.

For starters, why pay $1,500 for one thing nobody actually is aware of what it is for, and the battery solely lasts three hours? Even a smartphone can do it with the little benefit that Glass gives. Also, the product is taken into account ugly, or at the very least not appropriate for the way in which individuals put on it.

But one of many greatest issues is that of invasion of privateness. Constantly taking a look at your digital camera annoys the interlocutor, particularly when customers can take footage and even document movies with out the opposite individual figuring out. Still nervous concerning the machine being hacked.

Maybe it is a product that is forward of its time, however extra doubtless, it is being launched with a expertise pleasure that does not take into consideration the affect it might need on individuals’s lives. Now, Google is extra technologically mature and might launch extra helpful and constant merchandise. But the query that should be requested within the face of any new expertise stays: Do its advantages outweigh any issues it poses?

The firm seems to have realized from the errors of the unique Glass. Contrary to questionable utility, the brand new model focuses on addressing actual wants. “Language is the important thing to connecting one individual to one other. Still, understanding somebody who speaks a special language, or for those who’re deaf or laborious of listening to, making an attempt to converse with one could be a actual problem,” Pichai mentioned. mentioned in a speech. So the brand new Glass captures the speaker’s audio and renders the subtitles with translation projected on the glasses’ lenses.

Augmented reality and virtual worlds

There is a elementary distinction between Metaverse ideas (reminiscent of Meta) and augmented reality (reminiscent of Google Glass). The first means being immersed in a reality that doesn’t exist in a completely digital atmosphere. It’s like being within the recreation, fairly than interacting with it “from the surface”. Augmented reality, then again, initiatives digital components into our reality, permitting us to work together with them as in the event that they have been really there.

The metaverse is less complicated to perceive as a result of there are 20 years of ingesting merchandise from this supply. The most well-known of those is Second Life, which launched in 2003 and continues to be round regardless of comparatively few customers in the present day.

With gadgets like virtual reality glasses, Zuckerberg’s proposal now provides to the immersion on this digital atmosphere. Given that the corporate has invested billions within the expertise, it is not a query of “if” however “when” to ship every part introduced. Perhaps the most important hurdle is the proliferation of virtual reality gadgets, that are nonetheless too costly for the lots.

Augmented reality, in flip, has an even larger affect, as we’re not those who “enter” the digital world, however the virtual components that “invade” our world and permit it to be manipulated. Movies and collection abuse this useful resource to showcase futurism.

This is the interface utilized by character Tony Stark in a few of Marvel’s “Iron Man” films. Lots of people go away theaters wanting to have the opportunity to use this characteristic! But there are additionally daring proposals in the true world, just like the one Microsoft made a couple of years in the past round its merchandise just like the HoloLens glasses.

Many different firms are additionally making an attempt to set their very own banners on this house, reminiscent of Snapchat, which gives glasses glasses, created for individuals to share images and movies, and the brand new model additionally gives augmented reality. We cannot neglect Apple, which promised to have its personal glasses with this characteristic quickly.

Maybe the unique Google Glass was a industrial failure, however it permits us to take into consideration the attainable issues with such a expertise. This paves the way in which for higher augmented reality providers and the metaverse itself. That’s not to say they’ve all labored out.

Privacy considerations are nonetheless on the agenda, awaiting company regulation and even laws to forestall abuse. Additionally, some consultants fear that because the digital world turns into extra immersive and customizable, many will use them as a way of escaping real-world issues, as in the event that they have been a brand new sort of drug.

There is little doubt that we’re shifting in direction of this aim. Virtual and augmented reality maintain unbelievable potentialities for enhancing our lives, and regardless of these considerations, the extra immersive they turn out to be, the extra highly effective and attention-grabbing they turn out to be.

So it does not make a lot sense to need to “resist” it. What we’d like is to perceive and grasp all its advantages and management its dangers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.